.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to Cryptic Anthony.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="Cryptic%20Anthony:179769"]Beethoven has tons of head-bangable parts in many of his pieces. Ok, bear with me, what follows is gonna sound [B]very[/B] nerdy, but I know it so don't hold it against me. It's my opinion on comparing classical and metal. I think alot of metal brings classical forms to mind in its emphasis on riffs (aka motifs/themes in classical) and its emphasis on speed and virtuosity, but the most glaring difference between the two genres (and I know both classical and metal have many sub-genres) is that classical music is rich in its harmonies while metal is often very sparse (i.e. power chords or even single notes without any harmony). In classical music, it is common practice to harmonize in triads and seventh chords. In addition, there are specific rules for notating these harmonic textures, i.e. rules about inversions, voice leading, chord progressions, cadences, blah blah blah... There are tons of other ways to compare metal and classical, I'm sure. I think it's a pretty interesting topic. Ok, I've written far too much already...[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.004 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][