.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to MASlayer.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="MASlayer:304360"]Sorry bob but you're twisting it to suit your purpose in the debate...while a great quality, you're missing the issues to make Bush look bad and CLinton good...again! 240 yrs in prison? like I want my tax dollars supporting them...and if it was such good measure why did it need ratification to favor the death penalty in terrorists situations. Life sentences? I don't think so...DEATH PENALTY NO EXCEPTIONS. And to think you can try to lay Clinton's faults on Reagan and Bush? You know as well as I do treaties and made and broken and just because the one with Osama went bad doesn't mean it was the first or last and also at the time didn't pose terrorist actions AT THAT POINT IN TIME against the US. On the mom thing...let me rephrase it again becasue you're losing the translation...if someone killed your mom and all your closest friends pointed to one suspect and you laid your wrath on the word of your 7 trusted friends just to be told later you were wrong, it was someone else is the SAME as Bsh's info on wmd in Iraq...besides we've done more good for that country in 1 year than in several decades without our involvment[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.003 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][