.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to Nate.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="Nate:363542"]ArrowHead nli said:[QUOTE]Nate said:[QUOTE]and I don't think it has anything to do with "invasion of privacy". Think about this, would you want a crackhead or heroin shooting junky to work for you if you owned a business? Pot is no big deal in most people's eyes, but crackheads and dopeheads are pretty well known to lie, steal, cheat, etc. I wouldn't want them working for me either, and if I owned a business I sure as would drug test people just for that reason alone.[/QUOTE] Funny point, since crack cocaine and heroin are less likely to get picked up by urine screening. [/QUOTE] it was just an example. And if someone were a crackhead/ dopehead that would mean they would use quite a bit, more than likely it would show on a test. They screen alot down here in the south because there is a major meth problem in Knoxville so they want to make sure those idiots don't get a job so they can fuck with the company. Hailtheleaf - No dig at you man but there is no conspiracy to put cameras in your home so CVS can watch whether you smoke a joint or not. Get a job, I hear that most dishwashers don't have to take drug tests.:thescream: [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.005 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][