.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to HailTheLeaf.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="HailTheLeaf:364512"]ArrowHead nli said:[QUOTE]By the way, as far as where I get my info, I worked as management for a company that began to require screening after I was hired. I was never tested myself (grandfathered), but I had to go over test results for the people who were hired afterwards. The only results we counted were pot, coke and heroin were discounted or a second screening was requested. If the results showed up on the second screening as well (about a week later) then the applicant was not hired. p.s. - another loop for our paranoid hippy friend: sometimes if the applicant looked REALLY good, or had good experience, we'd hire them even when they DID fail.[/QUOTE] That's actually great news, although I doubt your company is in the majority there. I'm against testing altogether, but that shows more common sense.[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.003 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][