.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to PatMeebles.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="PatMeebles:397248"]ShadowSD said:[QUOTE]PatMeebles said:[QUOTE]Al Gore was more hardline on Iraq than Bush was. If Al Gore were elected, we would be in Iraq anyway.[/QUOTE] I honestly don't believe there is any evidence to suggest that anyone other than neo-cons intended a regime change in Iraq; if there is, I'd love to see it, as I watched all the debates in 2000 plus extensive news coverage and was quite up to date with the positions of both candidates. (Besides, if that's what Democrats really wanted, why were Clinton's late 90's Iraq airstrikes so focused in scope; he had eight years to overthrow Hussein and made not the slightest effort)[/QUOTE] I believe the legislation to overthrow Hussein was in 1998. Clinton, by that time, I think was caught up in Kosovo, Lewinsky, etc. I could be wrong on the exact date. But, Clinton probably didn't have the real stomach for a long term war. Plus, we thought sanctions were working.[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.005 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][