.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to weymouthdoug.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="weymouthdoug:428699"]handinjury said:[QUOTE]BornSoVile said:[QUOTE]what cheap video, you can't even see the plane still. [/QUOTE] Zackelys. Its fucking lame. Every time I see the footage of the pentagon, I say "wheres the plane?", "wheres the fucking wings?" if it was a plane, then the building should have a much bigger hole width wise becasue of the plans wings. And how does a plane get that close to the ground to hit the front of the building and not the top of the building. It was either a van or a missle that hit the pentagon. I think its really fucking week that our government knew all about this shit that day, but felt they had to fluff up the terrorism scandel. Very conveinent that the "plane" hit a unoccipied area of the pentagon. Wheres Dwyer, I need my spelling corrected.[/QUOTE] the wings would get sheered off hittting a building dumbass, the hole wouldn't be in the shape of a plane sillouette like in a Bugs Bunny cartoon. [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.012 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][