.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to DrinkHardThrashHard.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="DrinkHardThrashHard:434205"]demondave said:[QUOTE]No. Kiss is not as heavy as Judas Priest. Please. Judas Priest writing an acoustic song does not cancel them from being metal. Likewise, a rock band writing an occasional metal song does not make them metal. This has no bearing on whether they are good or not. But for some weird reason, their Kiss Army is determined to make everyone call them metal. [/QUOTE] Man, what are you talking about? Priest isn't heavy on any of the early albums. There are KISS songs as heavy as "Breaking the Law" and "Electric Eye". You obviously have not listened to a lot of KISS and you are trying to ID their style on a few popular songs you've heard. Power chords. Chugging. Metal lyrics. Solos. Metal attitude. Metal stageshow. Metal vocals. KISS had them, just like Priest or Saxon. If you're applying your logic to say KISS is not a metal band, then you can't just suddenly toss your logic to the wind and make exceptions for early Priest, Saxon, or 90% of the rest of the entire NWOBHM movement, which, not surprisingly, KISS was as heavy as or heavier (Yet it's perfectly okay to call Ethel the Frog and Vardis metal....) Josh is 100% correct, I've even heard Gene referring to KISS as a 'heavy metal' show. For the record, I am NOT a Kiss army member, I think the merchandise blitz is retarded, but I've been listening to them since I could walk (77-78).[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.006 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][