.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to ArrowHead is watching you.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="ArrowHead%20is%20watching%20you:633709"]Uh said:[QUOTE]http://techreport.com/reviews/2007q1/cpus/index.x?pg=6 Old article bench marking dual core chips all running Vista. Basically every Intel chip is better than its comparatively priced AMD counterpart. I still don't get SLI. I guess if you truly need the best possible graphics and want to spend $1000+ whatever on buying two top of the line video cards it's cool. But I thought benchmarks were showing that two cards are as good or worse than just a single better card which would be cheaper, less hardware to fuck up and way easier to upgrade. Maybe I'm just pulling that out of my ass though or basing it on old info when that shit just came out. [/QUOTE] Intel has always outperformed AMD, although by less and less as the years go by. That's why AMD is always cheaper. two cards in SLI will SHRED a single GPU setup. Most benchmarks show at least a 25% performance boost. And you said it exactly, " I guess if you truly need the best possible graphics and want to spend $1000+ whatever on buying two top of the line video cards" This is a niche market, most people would never need an SLI or Crossfire setup.[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.003 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][