.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to FuckIsMySignature.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="FuckIsMySignature:705938"]detazathoth said:[QUOTE]One of the things that jumped out at me during the hearings a few years ago was a question/statement by (senile) Jim Bunning in which he protested rather vociferously how wrong it was that athletes were getting better as they aged rather than falling apart physically. When put in these terms I don't see how it is that the public doesn't turn and say, "wait a minute, uh, can I have some", rather than continuing the inquisition. If Clemens used peptides to keep healthy and extend his career then I say good for him. He was talented before and he's talented now. The difference is that while other pitchers are crippled by his age he's still world class. However he got to this point, I say good for him. [/QUOTE] the problem with that logic is that it forces every other player into a situation where they have also do steriods/HGH in order to be competitive enough for a level playing field. now i can understand maybe if they tried allowing it under the circumstances that it was regulated to the improvement of physical health after injury. i do see a benefit to that, but i dont see how they can regulate something they cant control in the first place. the steriods may have improved and elongated the careers of Bonds, Clemens, etc...but you dont know what kind of side effects they have probably been dealing with as a result of usage. it is simply unfair to subject all the other players to such an obvious hazard. [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.004 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][