.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to Conservationist.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="Conservationist:802444"][QUOTE="menstrual_sweatpants_disco:802424"]I'm glad you backed up your opinions with some legit observations, though. I guess ultimately it's a difference in opinion, though. While he's certainly not doing anything you'd need a graphing calculator to listen to structure-wise, I do give him credit for stepping away from the completely linear stuff. And again, some of his songs are a lot simpler than others. Some are far more complex. I don't find the music flat and soulless, though. At least not a good chunk of it. I doubt you'd know off hand, but I'm curious to know what songs you've heard.[/QUOTE] I had a neighbor who was into Dave Matthews Band. He played it constantly. I have no idea what songs, or albums, but anything recorded 2007 or before, I think I've heard it :) There are some plusses to Dave Matthews. He can play his instrument. He likes instrumentalism. However, he also makes hollow works. I think he seems significant only because the norm is so goddamn bad. I'm one of those intransigent bastards who would rather just listen to Yes, King Crimson and a shitload of classical than worry about what's recent. It leads to interesting insights about music.[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.013 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][