.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to Dankill.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="Dankill:970565"][QUOTE="menstrual_sweatpants_disco:970366"][QUOTE="the_reverend:970350"]Right... the Big Dig sucks. You know what would really suck, having 2x worse traffic getting into/through Boston and having the shitty corridor which is now becoming green space. If they hadn't done the big dig, Boston would suck more shit then it already does. (I'm not saying it was done right, but it was needed to be done 15 years earlier).[/QUOTE] Troof. I think they projected that Boston would be in 22 hours of gridlock by now when they started planning the big dig. Needed to be done. [QUOTE="dreadkill:970353"]REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEPOOOOOOOOOOOST!!!!!!! http://www.returntothepit.com/view.php?formid=62544 [/QUOTE] Burrrrrrrned![/QUOTE] Don't get me wrong, the idea itself was good and for it ultimately happening was good, but the vast overrunning and overspending sucked and the fact that they keep finding more shit wrong with it, things they have to fix and defects that some project in 10-20 years could make the whole thing collapes in some parts is VERY BAD.[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.010 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][