.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to Conservationist.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="Conservationist:1001931"][QUOTE="Murph%20MAST:1001735"]Someone's "smarts" and their "Christianity" cannot, by fact, be ubiquitous terms, as Christianity as a doctrine and a historical movement is wholly inaccurate, being so far removed from anything remotely historically relevant, as well as actual first-century Christianity itself. Pauline Christianity, Coptic, Greek Orthodox, whatever, have not survived well enough to even be noted as Christian. [/QUOTE] Yet the core beliefs -- the philosophy -- of Christianity still exists much as it did then. Smart people take smart ideas from religions, and orient toward those. Idiots gear themselves toward idiotic ones, and making them atheists won't change that. You cannot teach a 105 IQ person theoretical physics. If you do, you'll just get wrong answers. [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.003 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][