.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to WarriorOfMetal.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="WarriorOfMetal:1028250"]The Powerball is definitely not their flagship amp...that title is held by the SE...and before that, it was the Savage SE, and the Savage 120 before that. Personally, I'm not a fan of the Powerball for myself, although I have heard it sound decent when other people were playing. Unlike the 5-6 times I tried a Powerball and was unimpressed, I knew I needed a Savage 120 the first time I tried one out, and bought one 6 months later. I've never tried the Fireball, but it should be mentioned that there are now two versions of it...the original 60W version, and a more recent 100W revision, which was intended to address most of the complaints that people had about the original. I've got the impression that it's somewhere between the Powerball and Savage 120, sonically speaking. The Powerball is extremely compressed and naturally has a rather mid-scooped tone, while the Savage 120 is more middy and raw, and like brian_dc mentioned before, they have KT88s, which pretty much make any amp they're in sound HUGE while retaining clarity and punch. I've tried an Invader 150 once, a few years ago (in the same room as a Powerball and my Savage 120), and I remember thinking it was pretty cool, and definitely preferred it over the Powerball, but I was still quite happy with my own amp. It might also be worth your time to check out the Blackmore model.[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.008 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][