.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to eyehatehippies.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="eyehatehippies:1155497"][QUOTE="Fuck%20Logging%20In:1155488"]Nothing you people are talking about is actually sci-fi, you people are talking about action films set in space. Go read a fucking Heinlein and learn something. [/QUOTE] Heinlein is decent, I'm not all that into "hard" sci-fi though, and his books generally devolve into blindly idealistic hippie utopianism, which can be hard to stomach. "Stranger In A Strange Land" would have been fucking perfect if they cut that crap out of it, it gets terrible about halfway through, but hey, I'll take that over most of his other books. If we're talking books, I could go on all fucking day, especially with Dick. I can never get enough Dick. It's hardly fair to criticize Total Recall as not being faithful to the original short story, since there wasn't really that much to work with, the movie would have been ten minutes long. In all honesty, it is fairly faithful, it just picks up where the original story left off, leaves off the ending, which wouldn't have translated very well to the big screen, and explores some of Dick's other themes and ideas that he established in his novels. I think that's a pretty significant achievement, actually. For movies, I'm surprised Moon wasn't brought up. That's probably the best sci-fi movie I've seen in the last decade. Pandorum was entertaining, but it was kinda long for what it was, and lost some of its coherency (what little it had even) as a result. [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.012 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][