.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to Doomkid.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="Doomkid:1039388"][QUOTE="Archaeon:1039240"]Peter Singer's agenda makes perfect sense to me and is the opposite of fuck up. NIGGER.[/QUOTE] Its not that Peter Singer's philosophy doesn't make sense, I just think he's wrong about the extent to which he takes utilitarianism. If one is going to put the pain of animals grown for food in a certain category one should also put all pain-feeling beings in that category. And pain is such a vague term that plants could easily be put in this category with their trauma-response systems.[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.003 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][