.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to xmikex.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="xmikex:1066363"]The Pats will not take Sergio Kindle. I'm putting that out there right now. He's Vernon Gholston part 2: big on athletics small on football skills. I think word is finally out on the dude, and a lot of the mocks I've seen lately have him going in the 2nd. There are just way too many players with more polished skill sets available at 22 for the Pats to take him there. Gronkowski with the 44th overall? When the hell did tight end become this must have position for everyone? I realize the Pats really need a tight end, and I realize they drafted high on Ben Watson. But for Christs sake, neither Gronkowski or Gresham played a single down in 2009 and neither one of them could block to save their life when they were playing. WR is a bigger need at 44, IMO. I like McCluster as a 3rd down Kevin Faulk type of player, but I think there are too many needs to address in the first 4 picks to take a running back. If they took him at 47 or 53 I wouldn't complain, but I think he's going off the board early in the 2nd because of the great pro day he had. Then whoever drafts him can remember that he's the size of Martin Gramatica. Jerry Hughes available at 53? Only Fox Sports would come up with that projection. [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.005 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][