.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to arilliusbm.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="arilliusbm:1170362"][QUOTE="arilliusbm:1170354"]Martins, the link wasn't working. I think you guys are missing the point I was making. Granted, Impulse Tracker is much more primitive than FL because it's older. But that is what I mean - you have to program everything you do. You have complete control over everything you're doing, and this makes the learning curve high. That's why you had to switch to FL.. it takes a long time to fully understand the program, and how to program effects and everything into it. I dabbled in FL for a few years and couldn't stand it. I actually preferred Reason over FL, even though they aren't really the same. My biggest complaint with FL is that I felt it was too easy. I don't like having everything laid out in front of me. Tracking music is all numbers and programming and thus, feels more free. The primitive aspect of it makes it more genuine in my opinion, but I haven't touched FL in about 3-4 years so I'm not sure what the newest version is like. It's over-simplified with a short learning curve. Descending numbers and letters > Piano Roll, ANYDAY![/QUOTE] I guess the big point is, though, FL stuff sounds way more "modern" and "real." It's hard to get an IT song to sound professional, but it really depends on the samples. It is a GREAT tool for making loops for FL and Reason, though.[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.004 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][